
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know......You have to admit there is just something inherently funny about a BIG guy flopping around on the ground like a Fish, screaming like a school girl while a Female Officer is telling him to NEVER lay a hand on her again and then zapping him a second and third time to drive her point home
Some guys are just slow learners I guess hehehe
__________________
Lary Ellis 18 Bravo |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
ever see the video of the cow being tased? Great stuff.
__________________
My stuff: SIG P229 DAK SIG P245 Detonics .45 Semi auto Other Website: Diesel Truck Resource - Great info source for Dodge Diesel owners! |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tasers...
Great example of why I wouldn't make a good LEO. I'm a pacifist, so when verbal communication breaks down in a potentially violent confrontation, I'd rather move directly to the blasting phase.
__________________
Gun Happy Now I need a bigger toolbox! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just for giggles:
Quote:
__________________
Blaming Magazine Capacity for mass shootings is like blaming computors for Child Pornography |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Scott See our facebooks group at http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?r...d=111525180715 Cling to your Guns and Your religion. It may be all we have left in a few years. I support the right to keep and arm Bears! Former Infantryman USA , Ret MM1 USN |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tasers are optional for me, but I've found them to be a very handy tool. There is always a tendency, though, for someone who just got trained on a fancy new hammer to see every problem as a nail. You just need to drive home that this is only one of many tools. You still need to make the correct decision on which one to use, and you always need a plan B.
Anyway, going hands on has it's disadvantages. Wrestling on pavement, or up against a chain link fence, both you and the resisting person tend to get skinned up. Getting tested for HIV, hep C and that kind of stuff from a work related exposure is not fun... Also, the times I've had to use one or seen a taser used, it was often in a situation where a night stick or other serious force would have had to been used. IMHO a police department has a responsibility to use tools and/or methods that reduce the risk of injuries to both officers and offenders, and in my experience tasers (with proper training) fall in that catagory. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I completely agree with everything you said, but in a perfect world (i.e. a litigation-free society
), what's wrong with meting out force to offenders - even if it's accidentally (or incidentally) excessive? I mean, if get bumped, bruised and rashed for scuffling with a LEO, shouldn't that be an important part of the deterrent value of criminally-induced punitive consequences? It ought to lower anyone's rate of recidivism... ![]()
__________________
Gun Happy Now I need a bigger toolbox! |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
We used to call that "street justice" in the 60's. It resulted in a lot of what I considered at the time "bad" court decisions. Some officers failed to use what I consider plain common sense--in some cases(ie; knowing when to stop). Thats where the problem started. No more basement confessions or using long hair and a VW bus as PC for a search(which never happened). One comment about spraying someone---why does one officer always have to give the suspect one last shot--just as he is being stuffed into the back of my patrol car--usually early in the shift--then I have to drive around in that car the rest of the night
![]() Jay
__________________
God Bless our troops, both past and present Semper Fi USMC NRA member Own and carry: .45 Colt Commander .380 Walther PPK |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
The first time I saw a Taser used, it was on a guy high on meth who was way out of control and took a swing at an officer. From what I saw it may have taken batons to get the guy in custody and likely both the subject and officers would have been injured. Instead the subject ended up with two little pin prick marks in his back, for which a band aid would have been overkill.
Tasers aren't perfect, but there are times when proper use prevents risk of serious injury to officers, and the subject. I see the original poster's point, in that there is a danger of having people just issued a fancy new hammer to view every problem as a nail, but that is an issue that must be addressed in training. Also, in this day and age, the point about going hands-on near a chain link fence or on pavement and ending up with a bodily fluid exposure is very valid. In the end the Taser is just another tool. With training and good judgement it can be valuable. Officers also need to be trained to be prepared with a plan B if it doesn't work, just as they are if some other tool or control hold doesn't work. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|